The Big Bang Theory: Mere Fiction?
Q&A Series with Aaravindha
Question: Is the Big Bang Theory really mere Fiction?
“Given all that you have taught us, we can safely assume that the Big Bang theory presents an insoluble conundrum, since it assumes a beginning within something that has no beginning or end. It seems instead that there has always been something along with nothing (or asymmetry along with symmetry). I still wonder about the inherent direction of manifested reality (or the universe) and how it has evolved. It seems that the inherent direction of creation is towards light and truth, or from less to more density and complexity. This seems to suggest that our current timeline or universe began in the least complex state possible. In other words, if the human body has a beginning and an end, then the universe should too, albeit on an incomparably larger scale. It doesn't seem too far-fetched to assume that the universe began in a way similar to the Big Bang. Could you share your insights on that?”
Aaravindha’s Answer: The Absoluteness of Time & Space, the Dreamer, and Quantum Flux
Yes. After tens of thousands of years of wonder and theory, both religious and scientific, in the 1920s a Belgian religious scientist, Father Georges Lemaître, introduced his Big Bang theory. Since then, lacking any other explanation, an endless collection of theorist scientists have elaborated on his theory, attempting to somehow prove him right—though none of them can say for sure, as the theory is irrevocably a theory dreamt up in the mind of one man who was driven by the silent mystery of where all things began. This is in itself a rabbit hole that can't be filled in, regardless of the endless mathematical formulas they devise and the space-time measurements they 'assume' are real, taken from light years away.
The problem, as you noted, is the question of a beginning in an eternity which in itself negates the possibility of a beginning—and yet it could contain an infinite line of beginnings within it all, of course having to be 'relative' in nature, as in the "theory of relative physics." One of the great failings in the Big Bang is the lack of acknowledgement of a transcendental reality and the quantum flux—that is, an ongoing relationship between time and the timeless, space and not-space, all and nothing, an Absolute Symmetry and a finite unfolding of probabilities on an endless arrow of time, in an even greater field of infinite timelines.
An ongoing relationship between time and the timeless, space and not-space, all and nothing, an Absolute Symmetry and a finite unfolding of probabilities on an endless arrow of time, in an even greater field of infinite timelines.
Yet, the ant still wonders what that elephant is that it's crawling across, and wonders endlessly where it came from and where it's going. What if that elephant is merely a very convincing Panchbhuta-reinforced dream in a shoreless medium of infinite possibility?
Yes, you are right in what you said: "apparently there has always been something along with nothing (or asymmetry along with symmetry)." That agency that dreams it all is the real Mystery. That Agency is Itself eternal in endurance and infinite in Power. It can be it all or anything in itself. And if you can imagine infinite possibility as being the ground for all that comes and goes, then an offset of the balance that is inherent in the whole can initiate a revealing of itself as an amortization of the possibility potentiated! See, beginnings and endings can be appearances and disappearances inside a higher Perfection field that is otherwise unknowable. Think about that for a while and sense if you can allow for that measure of possibility to be possible in your thinking. If not, try it out intuitively.
This universe can end, but only in your adherence to the linear movement of time. Though that ending possibility is presently beyond any known measure of time, as the eternal nature of Consciousness would then have to stop dreaming—and if it did, it would yet be self-aware, and the cycle of dreaming would continue on from there.
In the same way that your body is not a solid experience, consisting of an endless flux of probability particles singing in and out of existence, the universe is singing planets, stars, and galaxies in and out of existence, while sharing the future with the past, and the past with the future, through time wormholes generated as time Vyomen between black holes that point to the past and white holes that point to the future. The past is not separate from the future; the future is not separate from the past. That's relative, but not whole in its Truth. When seen as a single symmetric perfection, the oneness of time and space is absolute, but when lifetimes come and go, presenting the appearance of beginnings and endings, we see only the moment we are in, not the endless field from which all things come and exist in.
When seen as a single symmetric perfection, the oneness of time and space is absolute, but when lifetimes come and go, presenting the appearance of beginnings and endings, we see only the moment we are in, not the endless field from which all things come and exist in.
In truth, nothing ever ceases to exist—it simply moves from one timeline to another, one dimension to another, while being ever bound to a medium of absoluteness.
In reality, there is only One. In the dreamtime, there are endless comings and goings.
If you want to imagine the life of a universe in the same way you would a body, only on a larger scale, you would have to believe in death—another kind of dream. But if you can see beyond the body image, then you can see beyond the Universe image and only shifts would be there, dancing possibility between large and small moments, or living and dying for the convenience of life.
© Aaravindha Himadra
[Dieser Artikel ist auch auf Deutsch in Aaravindhas Kommuniqué auf unserer Website verfügbar – mit kostenloser Registrierung!]